Chapter 34: The Cabbie — Part 2
[Moriarty's Flat, Southwark — July 29, 2010, 4:00 PM]
Three victims in three weeks. Each one a headline that lasted one news cycle before London's appetite for tragedy consumed it and moved on. A businesswoman in Brixton. A student in Battersea. A retired teacher in Camden. Three people who'd climbed into a black cab and never climbed out.
The police were calling it coincidence. Three unconnected deaths—different demographics, different boroughs, different apparent causes. The transdermal compound had performed exactly as James's chemist had designed: rapid cardiac arrest, metabolised within hours, undetectable in standard toxicology. Each coroner had signed off on natural causes. Each family had grieved without suspicion.
Hope was ecstatic. He called after each kill with the breathless energy of a man experiencing validation for the first time in his life—the particular high of someone who'd always known he was clever and was finally proving it to the only audience that mattered: himself.
"Three for three," Hope said. His voice was rougher now—the aneurysm eroding him from inside, compressing the timeline between ambition and extinction. "They all chose wrong. Every one of them."
"They didn't choose at all," James said. "The pills are identical. We've discussed this."
"But they thought they chose. That's the point. That's the game."
James let him have it. Hope's delusion was operational camouflage—if the cabbie believed the victims had agency, his performance would carry the conviction of genuine belief. Method acting in the service of murder.
But three wasn't enough. Three deaths were data points. Four would be a pattern. And a pattern was what Sherlock Holmes needed to become interested.
"One more," James said. "Then you stop."
"I could do ten. Twenty. I could—"
"Four. That's the design. The fourth will be different—public, visible, someone whose death generates investigative pressure. The police will connect the cases retroactively. That's when it becomes interesting."
"Interesting for who?"
"For everyone."
---
[Various Locations, London — August 1-3, 2010]
The fourth victim was Beth Davenport, Junior Minister for Transport. Her death would land on desks that the previous three hadn't reached. James selected her not for personal reasons—he'd never met the woman—but for the institutional response her death would trigger. A government minister dying in the back of a cab would activate Scotland Yard's most visible investigative resources, which would, in turn, activate the consulting detective who operated in their orbit.
Hope took the job without hesitation. The minister's death was reported the following morning: cardiac arrest, apparent natural causes, found in the back of a licensed London taxi. The coroner found nothing unusual. The police found nothing unusual.
But the pattern—four deaths, four taxis, four cardiac arrests—was now visible to anyone looking for it. And someone would be looking.
James had prepared for this. Through Cooper's network, he monitored the Met's response. Through Vance, he tracked the flow of investigative resources. And through Priya's surveillance infrastructure—the machinery he'd built over two years, refined and expanded until it covered London's institutional landscape like a second nervous system—he watched for the name.
It appeared on August 5th. DI Greg Lestrade, Scotland Yard, had contacted an outside consultant for assistance with the serial suicide investigation. The consultant's name: Sherlock Holmes.
---
[Street Opposite 221B Baker Street, Westminster — August 6, 2010, 9:00 AM]
James had never been to Baker Street. He'd imagined it—fragments of set design from a television show that felt like something he'd dreamed rather than watched—but imagination was nothing compared to the reality of standing across the road from a door painted with the number 221B and knowing that behind it was the person his entire operation had been built to engage.
He wore the Jim from IT outfit—blue shirt, jeans, unremarkable jacket. No Westwood. No Richter suit. No operational identity. Just a man standing on a pavement, looking at a door, carrying a coffee he'd bought from the Speedy's Café on the corner. The same name as the coffee shop near Bart's where he'd staked out Molly. The coincidence was uncomfortable.
The door opened at nine-twelve. Two men emerged.
Sherlock Holmes was taller than James had expected. Lean, angular, moving with the particular kinetic energy of a mind that couldn't rest—hands adjusting coat collar, eyes scanning the street, processing data from the environment the way a computer processed inputs: automatically, continuously, without apparent effort. His coat was dark. His scarf was blue. His face carried the expression of someone who found the world simultaneously fascinating and disappointing.
John Watson walked beside him. Shorter, compact, the economical movement of military training embedded in muscle and habit. He carried himself with the particular steadiness of a man who'd been shot and had decided not to let that define him. His limp—James had read about the psychosomatic limp in Cooper's police briefings on the case—was intermittent. Present when Watson was thinking about it. Absent when Sherlock said something that redirected his attention.
Pressure point. The observation was clinical, tactical, the product of two years of studying human psychology for professional purposes. Watson was Sherlock's grounding wire. The person who translated the detective's brilliance into something socially functional. Remove Watson, and Sherlock would still be brilliant—but he'd be brilliant without anchor, without context, without the emotional reference point that prevented genius from becoming pathology.
James watched them hail a cab. Watched them climb in. Watched the cab disappear into London traffic, carrying two men toward a crime scene that James had designed.
He drank his coffee. It was good—better than the Speedy's near Bart's, which was saying something. He stood on the pavement and let the particular loneliness of the moment settle.
Here was a mind like his. Not identical—Sherlock's brilliance was deductive, observational, focused on solving. James's was architectural, strategic, focused on building. But the underlying mechanism was the same: a brain that couldn't stop working, couldn't stop seeing patterns, couldn't rest in the comfortable ignorance that most people inhabited like a warm bath.
They could have been friends. In another life—any of the lives James had inhabited or might inhabit—they could have sat across from each other in a pub and talked about pattern recognition and chemical analysis and the particular loneliness of being the smartest person in every room. They could have been colleagues. Collaborators. The kind of intellectual partnership that produced breakthroughs.
Instead, they'd be enemies. The story demanded it. The canon demanded it. And James, who'd spent twenty-eight months constructing the architecture of that enmity, had accepted the demand the way he'd accepted everything else in this life: by committing to the role until the role became real.
He finished his coffee. Dropped the cup in a bin. Walked south, away from Baker Street, toward the Tube station and the Southwark flat and the machine that was waiting for its next instruction.
The game had a player now. The player didn't know it yet. That was, James reflected, the best kind of advantage.
Note:
Read the raw, unfiltered story as it unfolds. Your support makes this possible!
👉 Find it all at patreon.com/Whatif0
Timeline Viewer ($6): Get 10 chapters of early access + 5 new chapters weekly.
Timeline Explorer ($9): Jump 15-20 chapters ahead of everyone.
Timeline Keeper ($15): Get Instant Access to chapters the moment I finish writing them. No more waiting.