[Klein Legal, Flatiron — October 10, 2012, 2:03 PM]
Cross arrived without calling.
This was not how Cross operated. In fourteen months of client work I had learned his rhythms: he called before dropping by, he sent email before calling, and when he arrived in person he had a specific agenda and had already decided what he wanted before he walked in. The absence of warning was its own communication.
He was carrying a FedEx envelope. The kind with the international sticker and the specific reinforced cardboard that said the sender had considered the possibility of the envelope being damaged in transit and had taken steps. He held it with the specific expression of a man holding a document he does not entirely understand but has correctly assessed as a problem.
I came out of my office when Sarah said he was at the door.
"Harlan." I gestured toward the conference room.
He came in. He set the FedEx on the table the way people set things down when they have been holding them for too long and are relieved to have a surface. He sat.
"A solicitor's firm in London sent this. Carrington & White. I've never heard of them."
I picked up the envelope. London postmark from four days ago. Express. The return address was Gray's Inn Road.
I opened it.
Fourteen pages. The cover letter identified the matter as an ICC International Court of Arbitration claim, London-seated, filed by Cross Infrastructure's counterparty on the Whitfield Bridge development project. Cross's London deal — the one he had closed at the Whitmore Club in May, the one where Hartley QC had run the covenant structure for him. The claim: material breach of performance obligations, specifically the March 15 construction milestone. The relief sought: €3.2 million.
I turned to page two. The preliminary CFIUS review letter was also attached. Filed separately, not by Carrington — by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Cross's London counterparty had a minority ownership stake held through a holding company that had acquired shares from a company with connections to a foreign sovereign wealth fund. The CFIUS review had been triggered by a security facility two miles from the bridge site.
I read both documents twice.
"Harlan." I kept my voice at the register that said this is manageable and I am managing it. "How many days ago did you receive this."
"The ICC claim came four days ago. I didn't understand what it was. I thought it was a dispute letter — we have a dispute mechanism in the contract, I thought it was them invoking it. My assistant said it was from a London court organization and I should call an attorney." He had his hands flat on the table. The stillness was back — the stillness that Cross used when he was working very hard to appear calm. "The CFIUS thing came yesterday."
Four days on the ICC clock. Twenty-six days remaining in the response window.
No window on the CFIUS. The Committee could freeze the deal at any time.
I set the documents down.
Do not let him see the adjustment happening. Cross had been watching Klein Legal for six months. He had watched Harold hold his first solo cross-examination. He had seen Don take the deposition and flag a conflict letter without breaking pace. He had built a specific picture of what Klein Legal was, and the picture was this firm does not get rattled.
I was rattled.
Not visibly. But the Library was already running in the background of my consciousness, pulling on every ICC-adjacent and CFIUS-adjacent tag in its stored cases, and the picture was thin. Two Soto CFIUS matter documents. No ICC arbitration cases at all. The Library's stored knowledge was 108 documents of domestic litigation and regulatory work, and neither ICC arbitration nor CFIUS national-security review was a field I had built a practice in.
I went to my desk. I opened the banking app.
$3,440 after the Voss retainer started flowing in. Twelve LP was $1,200. The alternative was sitting in front of Cross with nothing but the thirty pages I had just read and my own ability to research, which would take three days for a field I had never practiced in.
$1,200.
I authorized the conversion.
[+12 LP]
The Library's response was different from any search I had run before. Normal tag chains returned in four to eight minutes — targeted, fast, specific. This was the Library doing something it had not been asked to do before: synthesizing across dozens of stored documents simultaneously, not looking for a precedent but constructing an argument from the overlapping edges of what it knew. The Phase 2 transition had made this possible. The LP cost made it rare.
Twenty-two minutes.
Cross was sitting across the table. I had given him the two-page summary of both documents and told him to read them while I worked. He was reading. His jaw was set.
"Am I personally liable," he said, without looking up.
"The ICC claim is against Cross Infrastructure, not you personally. CFIUS review is company-level." I kept my eyes on the far wall where the Library was working in the background of my awareness. "Neither of these is a personal exposure matter at this stage."
"At this stage."
"At this stage."
He absorbed that.
The Library returned at 2:25 PM.
#novel-construction: ICC material breach defense / CFIUS administrative hold argument.
The argument was novel in a specific way: it used the CFIUS review's administrative hold as a force majeure-adjacent mechanism that materially affected Cross's ability to perform the March 15 milestone. The ICC Arbitration Rules recognized force majeure as a complete defense, and while a CFIUS review was not textbook force majeure, it was an unforeseeable government action that had directly impacted the performance timeline by creating legal uncertainty about whether performance itself was permitted.
The argument was not in any filed case the Library had indexed. It had been assembled from the overlapping logic of force majeure precedents, CFIUS review standard, and ICC arbitration rules — three bodies of law that did not usually share a room.
The Library tagged it: #brittle-if-oversold.
If I presented the argument as settled law, the arbitrators would find the gap quickly and the case would suffer. If I presented it as a novel construction, accurately, the argument had a real chance — ICC arbitrators dealt with international commercial complexity and were accustomed to creative defense arguments in multi-jurisdictional matters. The key was not to oversell.
I pulled out a legal pad and wrote a one-paragraph summary of the argument, the way I would explain it to Harold if Harold was being briefed for the first time.
"Harlan."
He looked up.
"The ICC claim has a defense. It's not a standard defense — it's built on the interaction between the CFIUS review and your performance obligations. The argument is solid but it requires an arbitrator who is comfortable with novel construction. London-seated ICC panels typically are."
"What does 'novel construction' mean in plain English."
"It means I assembled it from first principles rather than citing settled authority. I am confident in the logic. I am less confident in how any specific arbitrator will receive it."
He processed that. He was, I had learned over six months, a man who respected precision more than reassurance.
"What don't you have," he said.
The question was specific and it was the right question.
"London-seated ICC arbitration requires English co-counsel admitted to English practice. I don't have one."
He looked at me.
"I know one," I said. "I gave you her name six months ago for the Whitfield covenant structure."
"Hartley QC."
"I need to know if she handles ICC arbitration."
Cross pulled out his phone. He was already scrolling. He found the number — I had given it to him in May as a referral, and Cross, who kept contacts in a specific organized system that his assistant had tried and failed to digitize, had it available.
"Her firm lists ICC arbitration under specialties," he said, reading from the website. "She's listed as lead arbitration counsel."
The Library, quietly, opened a green tag: #hartley-qc #ICC-arbitration-confirmed.
I felt something I had not expected to feel in this conversation: a genuine pulse of relief. Not performed. Not calibrated. The specific physical sensation of a situation that had appeared to have no path opening one.
"I need to reach her this week," I said. "The response window is twenty-six days."
"I'll call her and tell her you're going to contact her." He pocketed the phone. He had his hands flat on the table again, but the quality was different from when he had walked in — not the stillness of held composure but the stillness of a man who has been told there is a plan and is deciding whether the plan sounds like a real plan.
"This is outside your normal work," he said.
"Yes."
"But you've got someone who does it."
"I know someone who does it. I need to confirm she's available. The field is one I will be learning as we go, which I am telling you directly."
He looked at me for a moment. The six months of accumulated context — the Gaines conflict letter handled without alarm, the clean deposition, Harold praised by name — were in that look, being weighed against the honest acknowledgment that this matter was at the edge of what Klein Legal had built.
"That's the most honest thing a lawyer has ever said to me in a professional context," he said.
"I should have been that honest in every professional context."
He stood. He picked up the FedEx envelope. He tucked it under his arm.
"Call Hartley," he said. "I'll tell her you're coming."
He left.
I sat for a moment with the legal pad in front of me, the one-paragraph argument summary in the corner, and the Library at 0.2 LP having spent twelve of the twelve purchased LP on a single construction that was either the right move or the most expensive wrong move I had made in three years.
The argument was good. I believed it was good. The Library's #brittle-if-oversold tag was the correct flag for the correct reason.
I picked up the phone and called Imogen Hartley QC's London office number.
The time in London was 7:31 PM.
She answered on the second ring.
✦ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✦
Read A LOT more chapters for free at unwrittenrealm.com
✦ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✦
TL;DR — Patreon has the chapters ahead.
Silver / $6 / 15 or more chap ahead
Gold / $9 / 20 or more chap ahead
Platinum / $15 / 25 or more chap ahead, no weekly wait
That's it. patreon.com/fanficwriter1
If reviews aren't your thing, no pressure — they do help though.