After Lawyer Gu finished speaking, everyone was stunned.
This one sentence cracked the entire case.
At this point, the verdict for Li Peng was no longer important.
The key question was how the evidence for the first trial was obtained.
The prosecution was responsible for bringing charges, and Li Peng was the defendant.
He was charged with purchasing and keeping a second-class protected animal.
There was a series of evidence following this.
But there was also a DNA test report in the detection report.
Can you identify a parrot's DNA from a photo?
It's obviously impossible.
This shows that in this case... someone provided false evidence!
And this is the court. If someone provides false evidence, that's a big deal!
This isn't a simple trial anymore.
A lot of people might go down for submitting false evidence!
It's the court. If the court offers false evidence, it's committing a crime knowingly, which aggravates the offense!
